Friday, September 18, 2009

Disgusting Racism


A Tea Party rally protester holds a sign with President Obama depicted as a witch doctor.

I posted this picture (from last weeks 9/12 demonstrations) here because I wanted a reminder why slime balls like Lintball, and Slantity, and Beck (doesn't even rate a nickname) are so dishonest and revolting. They have been screaming all week with outrage that if anyone dare criticize President Obama they are unfairly tagged as racists. Lou Dobbs, frustrated at being called racist, even asked, "Is America ready for a black President?" They see these images, they know this is happening, and they promote this attitude. Clearly, not everyone who disagrees with Obama is a racist. In fact, I am quite certain that an overwhelming majority of Obama critics are not racist at all. But when they stand side by side with these people and say or do nothing, even to the point of denying this vile hatred exists, then their inaction and silence is tacit endorsement. And then their arguments lose all moral standing. Reject the bull shit story-line that the left is a movement of hatred. This image is hatred. This image is disgusting. Real Americans will not allow this to continue.

This is a great article. Please read it all.

By Ashley Fantz
CNN

(CNN) -- Posters portraying President Obama as a witch doctor may be racist, organizers of Tea Party protests say, but they reflect anger about where he is leading the country.

A Tea Party rally protester holds a sign with President Obama depicted as a witch doctor.

The posters, showing Obama wearing a feather headdress and a bone through his nose, have been popping up in e-mails, on Web sites and at Tea Party protests for weeks.

The image has stoked debate and cast attention on the rallies, which have drawn people Tea Party organizers describe as on the fringe and not representative of the overall movement. Their general viewpoint, leaders say, is that there's been too much federal government intervention, particularly concerning health care and taxes.

The witch doctor imagery is blatantly racist, critics contend.

Others remind that presidents get made fun off all the time, and the election of a black president has only made racially charged political satire more sensitive.

While not denying the crudeness of the image, Tea Party organizers stressed that those who carry the signs are a few "bad apples."

"That [witch doctor] image is not representative at all of what this movement is about," said Joe Wierzbicki, a coordinator of the Tea Party Express, a three-week series of protests across the country.

The anger the image portrays, however, "says to me that a lot of people in this country are angry about the direction that the administration and Congress are taking us," he said.

"And you're going to see a wide expanse of those people," he continued. "Some are going to be more extreme. Most of them are going to be in the mainstream of American politics, as evidenced by Obama's falling poll numbers."

An incendiary image such as witch doctor detracts from any hope for a cohesive message at the rallies, where many appear not to be associated directly with either the Republican or Democratic parties, said W. Joseph Campbell, a media professor at American University.

And previous infringements of good taste don't make it acceptable to Photoshop the president into a witch doctor.

"It's true that presidents before have had to endure some rough stuff, and there's nothing wrong with satire," Campbell said. "President Bush was morphed into Hitler. That was not excusable either. Just because it's happened in the past doesn't mean there isn't a line and it can't be crossed."

As a politics and African-American studies professor at Princeton University, Melissa Harris-Lacewell typically advocates discussion about the racist overtones in images or language bandied in public discourse.

"But I'm concerned in the age of Obama, too many of our public conversations about policy have been limited to a kind of investigative effort to determine whether opposition to him is based on race or substantive disagreement," she told CNN. "The problem is, it can be both."

Harris-Lacewell points out that Obama made his African father a part of his campaign narrative. Now his critics are trying to mock that heritage.

"This witch doctor image is racist in a very specific way because of his proximity to Africa," she said. "You can imagine there would have easily been a time when [Jewish New York Mayor Michael] Bloomberg would have been portrayed in anti-Semitic ways. You can go back to political cartoons when Irish Democrats were mocked, Italians were lampooned."

Spelman College history professor William Jelani Cobb, who has written extensively about race and politics, points out the original Boston Tea Party was driven by colonists who frequently declared that they had been "enslaved" by the king of England. The men who led that revolt dressed up as Native Americans when they dumped the tea into Boston Harbor in 1773.

Hard to pin down and a seeming catch-all for general anger at the government, the modern Tea Party movement is grounded the belief that the federal government should stay out of state business. But "states' rights is also an argument with a history tied to racial segregation during the civil rights' era," Harris-Lacewell said. And so it comes full circle.

Cobb said Obama's election has also rekindled the historic rancor some whites feel against successful blacks.

"There is lots of connective tissue here," said Cobb. "The Atlanta race riot of 1906 was partly about this. The upsurge of riots at the beginning of the 20th century was driven in part by the fact that blacks were perceived to be moving up in society -- at the expense of whites.

The Atlanta race riot, which left 25 black people and two white people dead, was sparked by a series of false news reports about black people committing crimes, inciteful rhetoric from white politicians and an overall fear by whites that blacks were starting to make progress socially and politically in the south.

"Now we have a black president, which means, on its most basic level, that a black man has more power than any single white citizen in this country," Cobb said. "Whether people want to admit it or not, I suspect the Tea Party crowd believes that the currency of whiteness has been devalued."

There's another wrinkle to the witch doctor controversy. Obama was mocked by some critics as the "magical negro" during the campaign because he was perceived to be a solve-all to nation's problems.

"This is an echo of the theme during the campaign when his opponents would ask 'Who is Barack Obama?" Cobb said.

"At that point, it was part of a somewhat cynical attempt to depict him as vaguely foreign and unknown," Cobb said. "But now that he has control over actual policies, those views appear to have hardened, metastasized into something more vitriolic.

"Caricature is part of politics, but racist stereotyping isn't."

1 comment:

  1. There are things infinitely more disgusting and dangerous than holding up a poster that expresses the racist view that a black man is unfit to captain the ship of an advanced white civillization. Unlimited federal power, from which there is no escape, is one of them. Pro-federal monopolyists want to deny state rights because they think that states cannot be trusted to exercise government power justly. Federal monopolyists draw this conclusion because Southern states sanctioned slavery for a few decades longer than northern states did. Federal monopolyists imagine they can thwart tyranny by nullifying state rights and empowering the federal government -- as if the federal government isn't just as capable of being tyrannical as state governments can be. The unquestioned assumption is that the "good" Federal government will never exploit people like the "bad" state governments did -- even though the Federal government itself once sanctioned slavery, denied women the vote and practiced all sorts of "evils" that modern America has outlawed. This faith in the superior morality of the federal government is clearly illogical, but then, faith often is. Federalists BELIEVE, and believe that their faith makes their idealistic beliefs true -- despite all historical and contemporary evidence to the contrary. At least slaves could run away to another state. To escape federal tyranny, we have no place to run except to another country.

    ReplyDelete